Sign Up | Log In
Monday, Mar 16
Journal Logo

PAEDEIA: NSU Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Law

(ISSN pending)

Journal Logo
Title and Authors Name
“Heilige Grausamkeit” (“Holy Cruelty”): A “Perspective” on Nietzsche and Infanticide
By Norman K. Swazo
⬇️ PDF Download | ⬇️ HTML Download |
898 Views |
485 Downloads
Forgotten Memory or Hidden Identity?: Analyzing Krishnendu Chattopadhyay’s Jinnah Is Dead
By Mahabuba Rahman
⬇️ PDF Download | ⬇️ HTML Download |
274 Views |
121 Downloads
Reconciling South Asian Novels with the Anthropocene: A Postcolonial Ecocritical Study
By Syeda Fatema Rahman
Abstract: From novelist Amitav Ghosh to historian Dipesh Chakrabarty, the imaginative impediment at the heart of the climate crisis appears to be widely felt. Ghosh has argued that conventional novels often fail to grapple with the scale and improbability of climate change, while Chakrabarty has identified a methodological tension between postcolonial studies and the emerging field of Anthropocene scholarship. This paper attempts to reconcile the rift identified by Chakrabarty through a postcolonial ecocritical analysis of South Asian novels – that is, Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things, Shahidul Zahir’s Life and Political Reality and Bapsi Sidhwa’s Cracking India. In doing so, it argues that these texts subvert the Western anthropocentric human-nonhuman binary that Ghosh and Chakrabarty have articulated. The paper illuminates how boundaries between human and nonhuman actors are often refracted through caste and social hierarchies in South Asia, and how alternative conceptions of the natural environment and nonhuman agency are intricately woven into the narrative fabric of these works I further contend that environmental insensibility reflects a colonial mindset embedded within historical and social structures. Overall, this paper seeks to reconsider literature’s capacity to overcome its imaginative limitations in addressing climate change—a challenge both enabled and constrained by literary form, as Ghosh notes. Ultimately, the texts under analysis reveal that the project of reassessing human and nonhuman agency and reimagining their relationship in the age of the Anthropocene is well underway. In the words of Percy Bysshe Shelley, “Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world,” and more than ever, the current climate crisis underscores the urgent need for writers to engage their imagination in shaping a more ecologically conscious world.

Keywords: Postcolonial Studies, Anthropocene, Ecocriticism, South Asian Literature, Fiction.
⬇️ PDF Download | ⬇️ HTML Download |
222 Views |
126 Downloads
Teaching Weathering: Children’s Literature and the Renewal of Humanities Pedagogy
By Tess Ezzy
⬇️ PDF Download | ⬇️ HTML Download |
199 Views |
115 Downloads
The Mind-Body Problem in Times  of Ideological Radicalization
By Timo Schmitz
⬇️ PDF Download | ⬇️ HTML Download |
207 Views |
157 Downloads
Beyond Public and Private: The Limits of Prison Reform in Bangladesh 
By Sabiha Mehzabin Oishee
Abstract: Bangladesh’s prison system is marked by chronic overcrowding, prolonged pre-trial detention, inadequate healthcare, and persistent custodial deaths, raising serious concerns under both constitutional law and international human rights obligations. Despite repeated reform initiatives, these conditions have proven structurally resistant to incremental public-sector intervention. Against this backdrop, prison privatization has occasionally been invoked as a possible alternative, yet it remains largely absent from sustained legal scholarship in the Bangladeshi context and is often dismissed or endorsed on ideological grounds rather than constitutional analysis. This article examines whether, and under what conditions, prison privatization could be constitutionally permissible in Bangladesh. Drawing on domestic constitutional principles, international human rights law, and comparative experiences from jurisdictions including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and South Africa, it argues that privatization is neither inherently unconstitutional nor inherently corrective. Rather, its permissibility depends on the preservation of non-delegable state duties relating to liberty, dignity, and due process, alongside robust regulatory and oversight mechanisms. Rejecting both wholesale privatization and categorical rejection, the article advances a conditional, context-specific model of limited private involvement, focused on non-coercive functions and non-violent or remand populations. It situates privatization as a harm-reduction strategy within a demonstrably failing public system, while emphasizing that no institutional rearrangement can substitute for broader criminal justice reform.


Key Words: Prison Privatization, Constitutional Law (Bangladesh), Non-Delegable State Duties, Human Rights and Detention, Carceral Reform